2015-10-29最新更新GMAT逻辑机经
Q1
有一道是讲系安全带，一个人说学生坐校车系安全带不容易出事故，还有个人说有次出事学生寄了安全带还是没用，问两个人disagree的点好像
在群里看到的更新版本
A说：学生坐校车/公交车应该系安全带，不容易出事故/更安全/能够减少事故中受到的伤害.
B说：系安全带并不意味着更安全，上周发生的车祸，受伤的学生都是因为系了安全带没能逃脱而受伤的/困在车里而死掉的。
问：A 和B 这两个人disagree的点是什么? 这两个人都disagree什么?这两个人就哪个事实又不一样的见解?两个人无法就哪一项达成一致?
选项有:
校车上系安全带带来的伤害是否要大于它所能预防的。
公交车上系安全带和不系安全带哪个安全。
安全带是否能保护孩子。
公交车里和上下车时的不同安全情况。
开公交的司机是否更喜欢系安全带的。
大家都说选B
整理者个人观点：尽管系了也出事，那也比不系要强。
Q2
是那个车事故的，三个车厢的比其他的更不容易发生事故，选的是开这种车的是更有经验的司机，有考古。
(考古)
In the nation of Partoria, large trucks currently account for 6 percent of miles driven on Partoria’s roads but are involved in 12 percent of all highway fatalities. The very largest trucks-those with three trailers-had less than a third of the accident rate of single-and double-trailer trucks. Clearly, therefore, one way for Partoria to reduce highway deaths would be to require shippers to increase their use of triple-trailer trucks.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?
A. Partorian trucking companies have so far used triple-trailer trucks on lightly traveled sections of major highway only.
B. No matter what changes Partoria makes in the regulation of trucking, it will have to keep some smaller roads off-limits to all large trucks.
C. Very few fatal collisions involving trucks in Partoria are collisions between two trucks.
D. In Partoria, the safety record of the trucking industry as a whole has improved slightly over the past ten years.
E. In Partoria, the maximum legal payload of a triple-trailer truck is less than three times the maximum legal payload of the largest of the single-trailer trucks.
考题题目没变，答案问题变了
A: The government will restrict trucks in the smaller roads.
B: The company always use careful and experienced drivers to drive triple trucks.
C 还是原文的C
楼主选择B
别的狗补充：政府一般限制不让三厢卡车在小路上行驶(个人认为不对)
Q3
浮游生物在高与低(等考古)
Q4
historians found documents, including tax--super important, write it down to the pad, limited in the use for the study of women status. blablablabla, all dry explanations for what results in the limit
then it makes a turn:
(a douchebag seeing things in a different way), whatever she's called, figure out such omission/limit might be helpful though
blablabla again, a brief introductions of her assumptions
1764--very important--write it down to the pad, from here the article starts to cite the douchebag's specific evidence to support her assumptions
at least from here the story could go interesting, telling a vivid story, analyzing a literal work, whatever. BUT NOPE, 又是特别无聊的举例，说是在philly，怎么怎么样，关键是
tax assessor，对matriarch of a household特别关照，很多细节，很无聊，结果全部都提问了
最后结论：反映当时的recognition of a certain part of women status: 又是很多细节，都rec哪些了
Q5
我只记得一个。。。fire ant和H Lizard
大概说southern什么地方，fire ant的进入既破坏了H lizard 的食物(这里说H lizard的食物也是一种ant)也因为fire ant会叮咬H lizard，因此H Lizard在这个地方的数目降低了。但是在可能是north吧，没有fire ant，H lizard的数目也下降了，科学家认为这个下降也和fire ant有关。问题问啥我记不得了。。。应该是类似于加强或者解释。
Q6
逻辑是有一个是一种新能源是由农品的waste造，但是它的价格却要和市场其它能源一样，只能弥补cost,但是却有很好的经济未来。问加强(楼主选了一个说这个能源现在是并不是waste产生的，而是经济作物，意思是如果是waste就会有利润拉)
<< 完整机经版本点击下载：
以上就是百利天下出国考试向大家介绍的2015-10-29最新GMAT逻辑机经，正在准备GMAT逻辑的学生可以一起来看看上面的介绍。
您还可能关注：
