GMAT写作Argument是GMAT考试中最能反映考生语言表达和思路的一个单项，备考初期，考生需要学习一些优秀范文来提升自己的写作能力。接下来，小编为大家带来GMAT写作Argument满分范文分析，希望对大家的GMAT写作备考有帮助。
原题：The following appeared in the editorial section of a local newspaper:
"In the first four years that Montoya has served as mayor of the city of San Perdito, the population has decreased and the unemployment rate has increased. Two businesses have closed for each new business that has opened. Under Varro, who served as mayor for four years before Montoya, the unemployment rate decreased and the population increased. Clearly, the residents of San Perdito would be best served if they voted Montoya out of office and reelected Varro." Discuss how well reasoned ... etc.更多相关内容请点击》GMAT写作Argument如何锦上添花。
翻译：地方性报纸的编者按：
在Montoya当San Perdito市长的头4年里，人口下降而失业率上升。每当一个新企业开业，就有两个旧的关门。而在Montoya之前Varro当市长的4年里，失业率下降人口增长。很明显，San Perdito的居民重新选举Varro而非Montoya会得到更好的服务。
范文赏析： The recommendation endorsed in this argument is that residents of San Perdito vote current mayor Montoya out of office, and re-elect former mayor Varro. The reasons cited are that during Montoya's four years in office the population has decreased while unemployment has increased, whereas during Varro's term unemployment declined while the population grew. This argument involves the sort of gross oversimplification and emotional appeal typical of political rhetoric; for this reason it is unconvincing. 更多相关内容请点击》GMAT写作正确步骤分析。
First of all, the author assumes that the Montoya administration caused the unemployment in San Perdito as well as its population loss. The line of reasoning is that because Montoya was elected before the rise in unemployment and the decline in population, the former event caused the latter. But this is fallacious reasoning unless other possible causal explanations have been considered and ruled out. For example, perhaps a statewide or nationwide recession is the cause of these events. Or perhaps the current economic downturn is part of a larger picture of economic cycles and trends, and has nothing to do with who happens to be mayor. Yet another possibility is that Varro enjoyed a period of economic stability and Varro's own administration set the stage for the unemployment and the decline in population the city is now experiencing under Montoya.
Secondly, job availability and the economic health of one's community are issues that affect people emotionally. The argument at hand might have been intentionally oversimplified for the specific purpose of angering citizens of San Perdito, and thereby turning them against the incumbent mayor. Arguments that bypass relevant, complex reasoning in favor of stirring up emotions do nothing to establish their conclusions; they are also unfair to the parties involved.
In conclusion, I would not cast my vote for Varro on the basis of this weak argument. The author must provide support for the assumption that Mayor Montoya has caused San Perdito's poor economy. Moreover, such support would have to involve examining and eliminating other possible causal factors. Only with more convincing evidence could this argument become more than just an emotional appeal.
逻辑漏洞分析：1.非此即彼，每当一个新企业开业，就有两个旧的关门不见得就是坏事情，旧的部门不能适应社会发展被优胜劣汰是很正常的。
2. 无因果联系，失业率下降人口增长或人口下降而失业率上升对于居民是否获得好的服务并没有直接关联。更多相关内容请点击》GMAT满分作文经验谈。
英文分析：1. It is fallacious reasoning unless other possible casual explanations have been considered and ruled out. recession depression downturn低迷时期 is part of a picture of ... Mayor
2. Set the stage for Yet another possibility is that Varro enjoyed a period of economic stability and Varro's own administration set the stage for the unemployment and the decline in population.
3. Availability emotionally intentionally specific specifically anger angry citizen thereby bypass
4. cast one's vote for sb. eliminate abolish casual emotional appeal缺乏standard ratio of the closed business to new business in the whole country未排除他因造成了不同。
GMAT写作能力的提升需要考生在备考过程中不断学习总结，GMAT写作范文可以帮助考生快速掌握写作重点，把握写作方向，考生要高效利用。更多关于GMAT备考的资讯小编会持续为大家送上，大家也可以关注前程百利GMAT网站获取更多备考资讯，祝大家早日梦圆名校。
您还可能关注：
