下面我们来看一下这类题型的解题技巧，依然采用前面介绍的方法。如果大家想深入理解，可以利用OG中对应的题目练习，小编已经将题号整理在下面。
Chapter 9 Resolve the Paradox Questions
OG: 8,9,18,22,24,46,59,62,80,92,98,
1. Stimulus Peculiarities
Besides the discrepant or contra dictionary facts, most Resolve the Paradox stimuli contain the following features:
a). No conclusion
When you read a stimulus without a conclusion that contains a paradox, expect to see a Resolve Question. If you read a fact set that does not contain a paradox, expect to see a Must Be True question or a Cannot Be True question (less likely).
如果你读完一个stimulus没有包含一个结论而是包含一个paradox,那么期望看见resolve question . 如果你读完stimulus没有包含paradox，也没有包含结论， 那么估计是一个must be true 或者cannot be true (不太可能)
b). Language of contradiction
In order to present a paradox, the test makers use language that signals a contradiction is present, such as：标志词
But, However, Yet, Although, Paradoxically, Surprisingly
如果能很快识别出这个问题的类型，那么你将领先于别人
题干特点：which of the following ,if true…..
2. Active Resolution
The correct answer will actively resolve the paradox, that is, it will allow both sides to be factually correct and it will either explain how the situation came into being or add a piece of information that shows how the two ideas or occurrences can coexist.
答案将会解决那个矛盾，他会允许两个观点都同时成立，还会解释这个情况是怎么来的 或者加上一个可以展现出两个观点同时共存的信息
Because you are not seeking to disprove one side of the situation, you must select the answer choice that contains a possible cause of the situation. So, when examining answers, ask yourself if the answer choice could lead to the situation in the stimulus. If so, the answer is correct.
记住你不是选择一个反驳这两种情况的观点，你必须选择一个选项，它包含一个可能的起因。
当你检验它是否正确时，问自己，是否这个选项可以引起这个情况发生。
The following types of answers are incorrect:
①If an answer supports or proves only one side of the paradox, that answer will be incorrect. The correct answer must show how both sides coexist.
如果一个答案 仅仅支持或证明 那个矛盾的一个部分，那么这个答案是错的。正确的答案必须展示出两个方面共存
②If the stimulus contains a paradox where two items are similar, then an answer choice that explains a difference between the two cannot be correct. If the stimulus contains a paradox where two items are different, then an answer choice that explains why the two are similar cannot be correct.
In short, a similarity cannot explain a difference, and a difference cannot explain a similarity.
一个相似点不能解释一个不同， 一个不同点不能解释一个相同
Eg：比如 那些抽高尼古丁含量的烟的人 和抽低含量的人血液中的尼古丁含量相等
这是个相似性，所以用相似性来解释
因为能被血液吸收的尼古丁的含量是一定的对每一个人，能被人体吸收的含量不会超过 低尼古丁烟中的含量
When attempting to resolve the paradox in the stimulus, you must address the facts of the situation. Many incorrect answers will try to lure you with reasonable solutions that do not quite meet the stated facts. These answers are incorrect. The correct answer must conform to the specifics of the stimulus otherwise how could it resolve or explain the situation?
当你尝试去解决paradox的时候，你必须考虑这个情况的真实。
许多答案会去吸引你 用一个合情合理 但又不完全满足陈述的 事实的方法，这些答案是错误的。
正确的答案会遵守stimulus的特点，否则，他怎么能解决或者解释一个情况的。
您还可能关注：
