GMAT逻辑的下面三道例题小编做了详细的分析,大家如果觉得这种方法好用可以沿用这种方法解答其它题目。
The number of new cases of tuberculosis diagnosed in Country X increased dramatically this year. The country's news media have speculated that the sharp increase in new cases is the result of the tuberculosis outbreak that occurred in neighboring Country Y last year. Health officials in Country X have therefore proposed that all visitors from Country Y must submit to a medical examination before entering Country X.
Which of the following, if true, most strongly suggests that the proposed medical examinations will NOT help curb the spread of tuberculosis in Country X?
|
|
|
Country Z, which also neighbors Country Y, has not experienced an increase in cases of tuberculosis. |
|
|
|
Current medical technology is not capable of detecting all carriers of tuberculosis. |
|
|
|
Country X does not have the resources to examine all visitors from Country Y. |
|
|
|
Tuberculosis is not spread through human contact. |
|
|
|
Citizens of Country Y will not travel to Country X if the proposal is implemented. |
解答:注意题干的结论和问题的核心,两者是不同的,题干的结论在说:进入X国家的人必须上交medical
examination,问题的核心是:这个medical examinations不会帮助停止这个疾病的散播
选项A: 另外一个例子,没有经历同样的疾病上升的情况,这个仅仅表示其他国家的现象,和这个X国家无关,因此这个是无关选项
选项B: 现在医药技术不能侦探出所有携带该疾病的携带者。注意是携带者,而不是散播或者有类似散播的意思,因此这个选项可以帮助curb the spread of tuberculosis,这个选项仅仅表示对于已经有病的人侦探不出来,可能可以侦探出潜在发病的人,那么就有可能curb spread了。
选项C: X国家没有资源来检查所有拜访者,这个选项仅仅表示X国家不能检查拜访者是否有这个疾病,但是题干里面没有说要X国家检查拜访者,只不过说需要拜访者提交medical examination,这个examination不一定是需要国家X来执行的,因此这个选项也不是正确选项;
选项D: 表示这个疾病不是通过人接触来传播的,因此人不是散播这个疾病的根源,那么你要不是一个疾病的根源递交examination来确保这个疾病不会spread到自己国家的愿望就不能达到,因此这个符合正确答案的要求;
选项E:Y国家的人是否来X国家和结论无关;
Educator: Like many other difficult pursuits, music requires intense study and practice from an early age in order for one to become proficient. But many school music programs encourage only children who demonstrate early aptitude to continue studying music, while children who do not appear especially musical are directed towards other activities. Having learned to think of themselves as musically inept, these children do not devote any time to music, and thus some of them deprive themselves of the opportunity to develop latent but potentially significant musical talent.
The educator's statements, if true, would best support which of the following conclusions?
|
Music education should not devote special attention to talented students. |
||
|
|
|
Everyone has the potential to learn music. |
|
|
|
The number of proficient adult musicians is less than it could be. |
|
|
|
Children are particularly sensitive to criticism from adults. |
|
|
|
All children should study music. |
解答:题目说音乐要求在一个人还是比较年幼的时候就开始密集的学习和锻炼,但是一些学校的音乐项目仅仅鼓励那些在早期就被证明有潜力继续学习音乐的孩子,当一些看似没有音乐细胞的孩子就直接转到其他活动中去。孩子们在知道自己是音乐方面的无能以后,就不会投放时间去音乐上面去,因此这些孩子中的一些就被剥夺了可以发展潜在的但是是潜力非常大的音乐天赋的机会。问结论。结论必须紧跟所有的题干里面的信息走
选项A: 音乐教育不应该投放特殊的注意力给有潜力的学生。这个结论是出题者加入了自己的主观思想,题干里面就说了一些学校仅仅鼓励有潜力学习音乐的孩子,但是题干没有说这个行为是positive or negitive,因此这里添加了出题者自己的想法,认为是negative的,因此这个答案不是题干的结论;
选项B: 这个说每一个人都有潜力学习音乐,这个明显是题干的引申再引申的含义了。。。离开题干太遥远,题干说一些学生因为被告知自己对音乐inept,因此不会花时间学习音乐,因此some of them被剥夺了发挥无限潜能的机会,而不是每一个人;
选项C: 杰出的成年音乐家的数目要比本来可以有的数目少,符合题意。因为一些学校只鼓励那些早期就有潜能学习音乐的孩子,因此一些孩子本来后期也有潜能的,现在就不学习音乐了,因此本来可以成为杰出音乐家的现在也不会了,因此要比本来可以有的数目少。注意题干里面说道的是significantly potential,就表示这些学生因为被忽略了,因此没有学习音乐,但其实他们有很大的潜能,这个很大的潜能就可以帮助他们成为杰出的音乐家;
选项D: 这个和选项B一样,发散性思维;
选项E: 和题干毫无关系;
While political discourse (论述)and the media in the United States have focused on the rise of job outsourcing, few have mentioned the sharp fall of talent “insourcing,” or the drop in enrollment of foreign-born graduate students since 2001, and its dire results. The decrease in such insourcing will hurt America’s competitiveness in basic research and applied technology, with serious consequences for years to come. The de-internationalization of graduate programs across the country will also negatively affect the global outlook and experience of the American students remaining in those programs; they will not have the opportunity to learn about foreign cultures directly from members of those cultures. What distinguishes the decline of talent insourcing from the rise of job outsourcing is that the former can be easily rectified by a policy change of the United States government.
The answer to which of the following questions would be most useful in evaluating the author’s claim regarding the impact of decreased insourcing in America?
| What is the cost to reverse the trend of insourcing in America? | ||
| How does insourcing replace domestic jobs lost from outsourcing? | ||
| Since 2001, what has been the decrease in the number of foreign-born students in America? | ||
| What opportunities do American graduate students have to interact regularly with foreigners who are not students? | ||
| What effect would a government policy have on the number of foreign graduate students? |
解答:这篇在做的时候就不知道作者要表达的意思。现在搞明白了,就是在将talent insourcing的下降没有被关注,其结果会造成:hurt America’s competitiveness in basic research and applied technology, negatively affect the global outlook and experience of American students remaining in those programs and not have the opportunity to learn about foreigh cultures directly from members of those cultures. 题目的意思是那个选项最能帮助评价作者对于insourcing 的下降所带来的影响,因此答案肯定是要和我前面说的三个影响有关的
选项A: cost和三个影响都无关‘
选项B: 文章没有说insourcing 可以替换domestic jobs,更没有说insourcing 和outsourcing之间的联系;
选项C:多少出生在国外的学生下降了多少,题干说道insourcing是对国内学生的影响;
选项D: 和第三个影响有关,insourcing的下降会造成国内的美国学生失去和来自这些国外的学生交流和学习到国外的文化的机会,但是作者没有说这些学生是否可以跟其他的不是学生的外国人交流,因此如果这个选项的答案是YES,那么insourcing decline不一定对国内的学生会有第三个的影响,如果是no的话,那么就肯定了作者的claims
选项E:政府的政策可以对insourcing 下降有一定的正面作用,但和国外的毕业学生无关。
您还可能关注:

