2016年6月5号GRE issue点睛预测机经，主要是针对考生们对issue观点表达的弱项，快速的掌握一些自己的观点，然后更加充分的使用论证。
预测1：
In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions.
在所有的研究领域中，新手要比专家更有可能获得重要的发现。
思路解析：
求正：
1)A新手对于新鲜事物有着强烈的好奇心和勇于探索的勇气，而且可以不落常规，大胆思考;而老手而容易因循守旧;b新手有着强大的动力想成就自己的一番事业，建立自在此领域的声望。
2)老手有更多的经验，学识更加的丰富 ,这一切都是新手不具备的，而那些可以让老手少走弯路，对于整个领域的发展有着良好的预见性，指导哪个领域的发展更有研究价值。
3)老手新手应该合作，现在的很多发现都是团队完成的。
现在的科研,比以往任何时候都黑要更识，新手也好老手也好，他们应该互补不足，扬长避短,才能有更大的贡献。
范文赏析：
In the contemporary society, we human have gained maybe themost thorough and complicate knowledge system than any other eras before, butunfortunately also the most enormous acquirement of more important discoverieswhich be desired by the development of almost every realms. So this is thequestion affronted us: in any field of inquiry, whether the beginner or expertwould the most efficient discoverer? To this question, people may offer theirrespective points based on their personal stands. As a beginner, my point isthat the beginner will play more important role in the endless progresssearching for knowledge.
In the first place, I have to concede that we can notefficiently make any discoveries without the help of expert. Expert is a kindof people who own such characteristics--experience accumulated from thepractice and time; knowledge gained through long terms hard-working; also thehigh psychological level based on undergoing diverse situations. And with theexperience they own we could make a short avenue to new knowledge by avoidingmaking mistakes; the knowledge they own may help us to handle the base on whichwe could infer to somewhat discoveries;and only with their mature psychologicallevel could we make rational decisions when we encounter some difficulties. Allthese are just could be brought by the expert and could lead us a better way tonew discoveries.
However, the most significant factor of discoveries issomething that is the expert hard to brought to us--innovation. But to thebeginner with such a typical factor--lack of experience especially that ofpractice, it is maybe more easier, even instinctive, to obtain innovation whichcould lead progress to make discoveries. The scarcity of experience does notrestrain the beginner's to make somewhat contributions to make discoveries, tothe contrary, it keep the beginner's mind on a condition which could producesome illusions that may be eliminated by experience such as the expert own.Such illusions, maybe useless or relateless on the surface, could maintain alot possibilities that every one may could lead a astonishing discoveries inevery realms--just consider the Brain Storm mean that have been applied toproduce a lot of new ways to solve difficult problems and some eventually leada innovation or a new discovery. So the beginner's influence to makingdiscoveries may be the decisive one.
In addition, the benefits of the expert that I just mentionedin the second paragraph maybe also a double-edged sword. This point may beparadox but it is on the correct philosophical side--consider things from bothpositive and negative aspects. Their experience could also restrain theirimaginations and creativetations; the "accomplished" knowledge theyown may be a fetter to hamper them learn and accept some new theories; latestbut not least, some of the expert have not sufficient courage to questionsomething that may lead important discoveries because they can not afford therisk of losing their position and famous, just consider what will happen if theEinstein, when his still a beginner of enormous physical academicals world,have not dare to question the Newton's classic physical system? But thebeginner could just question what they do not agree with or doubt to withoutany apprehensions about losing something-------they have nothing to lose. Socontrast to the beginner, the expert is less likely to make any discoverieseven important ones.
Although beginners also have some negative aspects such asunstable working condition but never overweight their brilliantcharacteristics. Every expert was a beginner but why they got changed duringthe progress pursue the knowledge? If every experts could keep the passion whenthey were still beginners and molt the fetters which restrain them, we couldgot more and better discoveries.
The main benefit of the study of the history is to dispel the illusion that people living now is significantly different from those people who live in earlier times.
1正面。
不同时期的人在某些方面是相似的，如：对爱情的渴望，和平稳定的追求,未知世界的探索等。
2.反面。
在很多方面不同时期的人存在很大差别如：生活、学习方式有很大变化;还有，面临的问题也不同，环境污染、资源匮乏、核武器问题、人口过剩等。
3.反面。
新定义,即历史研究的好处是对人与社会发展规律的理解和把握，以史为镜,可知兴衰。通晓历史，能帮助我们总结前任的经验教训，在面对相似的问题时我们能更好地去解决。
Are we today greatly different from our forefathers onehundred years ago, fifty hundred years ago, or a thousand years ago? You willsurely not be punished if you answer to such an ambiguous question goes fromone end to the other of the full spectrum. The answer depends heavily on whatelements we are comparing or contrasting. Physically we are not much differentfrom them in that both the forefathers and people today eat, drink, talk, work,and die. But is it convincing enough to say that we are not much different fromthem? The way we talk is no longer what it was five score years ago; the foodwe eat and how we eat have undergone remarkable change; even the diseases thatkilled the forefathers today kill people in a novel and perhaps more effectiveway. In the past people survived by means of hunting, fishing, and collecting.But today people make a life by buying and selling. Are we fundamentallydifferent from people who lived before us? If I provide with an affirmativeanswer, I will be said to have illusions. Alas.
Is it an illusion to think that we are astonishinglydifferent from our ancestors? Admittedly, we are still very similar to themonkeys, physically, just as were people who lived five hundred years ago.Nevertheless, we are what we are, but not what our forefathers were. We do notrely mainly on military power to conquer or defense as did people who livedbefore us, although military power is still emphasized by many nations. In theancient Rome Julius Caesar and Alexander the Great considered the triumph to bea war in which the enemies were entirely defeated. But today, our politicalleaders would consider a campaign to be a triumph only when both partiesinvolved in the campaign are benefited. Are we today different from the peoplelived before us? Am I in illusion to think that we are different from ourforefathers?
Should any human illusion be dispelled? Frogs, dragonflies,or paying mantis perhaps never have any illusion, nor have they had everconducted any study of history, their history or the history of other animals,says, foxes, wolves, or ablators. We are human beings. We have illusions, not necessarily negative.Astrology, alchemy, mythology, witchcraft, and perhaps all forms of what wecall pseudo sciences are the source of various human illusions. Shall we dispelthe illusions by eliminating or eradicating these pseudo sciences? They playtheir roles. Just as night and darkness are against day and the light,illusions are against the truths. But without the night and darkness, neverwill there be the light and day.
Thus I claim that the benefit of the study of history is notto dispel human illusion. Nor is it to convince that we are similar to thepeople before us. The benefits of the study of history are determined by suchparameters as the person who conducts the study, what she studies, the purposewhy she studies, and how she conducts the study. To the scholars who studyhistory under the supervision of a totalitarian, the main benefits of the studycome to the governor rather than to those governed. For instance, during the1950s, Chinese scholars who studied the history of the Second World Warfocusing on why Japanese troops withdrew from the mainland of China distortedhistory to exaggerate the leader roles played by the communist party. What isthe main benefit of this study of this history? It is clearly not to dispelillusion but to create illusion. And ithad! A myriad of Chinese young people born in 1960s and 197s were subject tothe distorted “history” and they were convinced that it was the leadership ofthe communist party that dispelled the Japanese. They have little informationabout the contribution of the American nave force, air force, and the militaryforce of the former Russia.
I therefore say that the main benefit of the study of historyis not homogenous. Its spectrum is rather broad and colorful. While it is notentirely wrong to connect it with the illusion that people today are similar topeople in the past, it is a hasty conclusion based on weak ground.
以上就是关于2016年6月5号GRE issue点睛预测机经的分析，希望对考生的备考有所帮助。
您还可能关注：
