本文针对6月5这场考试中写作真题的回忆与分析，希望同学们能够吸取本文分析中的长处并化为己用。预祝各位同学都能够有一个理想的写作成绩。
Issue
Scientists and other researchers should focus their research on areas that are likely to benefit the greatest number of people.
分析：话题围绕“科学家和研究人员应该专注于可以有益最多人的研究领域“，需阐述个人的观点。
可结合历史case，个人experience等展开讨论，科学家和研究人员是否应该只专注于可以有益最多人的研究领域。议论文introduction部分须提出明确的thesis statement，main body中的讨论可以一边倒，也可以两方面都考虑有益最多人和有益少数群体的各自情况，make sense即可。
Argument
There is now evidence that the relaxed pace of life in small towns promotes better health and greater longevity than does the hectic pace of life in big cities. Businesses in the small town of Leeville report fewer days of sick leave taken by individual workers than do businesses in the nearby large city of Masonton. Furthermore, Leeville has only one physician for its one thousand residents, but in Masonton the proportion of physicians to residents is five times as high. Finally, the average age of Leeville residents is significantly higher than that of Masonton residents. These findings suggest that people seeking longer and healthier lives should consider moving to small communities.
Write a response in which you examine the stated and/or unstated assumptions of the argument. Be sure to explain how the argument depends on these assumptions and what the implications are for the argument if the assumptions prove unwarranted.
分析：(文本大意)小城市慢生活有益健康活得更长。首先，小城市请病假的时间少于大城市。 其次小城市配备的医生也要少于大城市。最后，小城市平均年龄大于大城市。这些发现有意味着希望长寿健康的人们应该去小城市。
结合文本分析，“要长寿健康就要去小城市“这一观点，是否有足够evidence支撑，并且也需要适当指出这段文字的fallacies。Fallacy具体思路可涉及：insufficient evidence证据不充分;incomplete information信息不完整;changing scopes差异范围草率推广;inferring a future condition from a past condition根据过去的情况推测未来等等!
您还可能关注：
