雅思大作文题材多样，而且难度一定，考生要做好充分准备。下面，就Nature or Nurture?这个问题，让我们开启探讨雅思教育类大作文旅程吧。
雅思作文题目：
It is generally believed that some people are born with certain talents, for instance for sport or music, and others are not. However, it is sometimes claimed that any child can be taught to become a good sports person or musician.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. (剑7 test1 task2)
范文：
The relative importance of natural talent and training is a frequent topic of discussion when people try to explain different levels of ability in, for example, sport, art or music.
Obviously, education systems are based on the belief that all children can effectively be taught to acquire different skills, including those associated with sport, art or music. So from our own school experience, we can find plenty of evidence to support the view that a child can acquire these skills with continued teaching and guided practice.
However, some people believe that innate talent is what differentiates a person who has been trained to play a sport or an instrument, from those who become good players. In other words, there is more to the skill than a learned technique, and this extra talent cannot be taught, no matter how good the teacher or how frequently a child practices.
I personally think that some people do have talents that are probably inherited via their genes. Such talents can give individuals a facility for certain skills that allow them to excel, while more hard-working students never manage to reach a comparable level. But, as with all questions of nature versus nurture, they are not mutually exclusive. Good musicians or artists and exceptional sports stars have probably succeeded because of both good training and natural talent. Without the natural talent, continuous training would be neither attractive nor productive, and without the training, the child would not learn how to exploit and develop their talent.
In conclusion, I agree that any child can be taught particular skills, but to be really good in areas such as music, art or sport, then some natural talent is required.
一、 话题类型：
教育类
二、 题目类型：
讨论类
三、题目简要内容：
A方-很多人生来具有天赋;
B方-任何孩子都可以被教成才。
四、素材积累：
讨论类文章开头常用的套话：
...is a frequent topic of discussion. …是人们经常谈论的话题。
表示论证的句型：
1. So from our own school experience, we can find plenty of evidence to support the view that...
我们可以找到大量的证据来支持这一观点。
2. In other words, there is more to….
换句话说，...不仅仅是...
五、论据积累：
考生在论证观点时可以适当运用事实论证，解释说明论证以及让步和反驳论证来支撑自己的写作，本文中就很好的运用了这些方法。
六、结构分析：
本题的理解主要关键点在于体育和音乐上能否取得成就是取决于天赋还是后天的培养。对于讨论类话题，考生不能只提出自己的观点就行，而是要先分析对立双方的观点，之后再给出自己的观点。
文章整体结构：
五段式：
第一段改写题目，引出话题;
第二段与第三段分別讨论两个方面的观点并给出理由;
第四段给出自己的观点;
第五段结尾段概括总结。
第一段：
The relative importance of natural talent and training is a frequent topic of discussion when people try to explain different levels of ability in, for example, sport, art or music.
由此可以看出，讨论类文章的第一段不一定提出两方观点，也不一定要提出自己的立场。考生可以只是提出话题，就此讨论即可。
relative importance 相对重要性
levels of ability 能力水平
第二段：
第二段论述反方观点，即作者认为孩子是可以被教成才的，并通过学校经历这样的事实论证来支撑。
Obviously, education systems are based on the belief that all children can effectively be taught to acquire different skills, including those associated with sport, art or music.
举例：So from our own school experience, we can find plenty of evidence to support the view that a child can acquire these skills with continued teaching and guided practice.
be based on 建立在
associated with 与...有联系
continued teaching 持续的教育
guided practice 有指导的练习
第三段：
第三段提出正方观点，即作者认为孩子生来就有天赋。通过解释说明论证来支撑自己的观点。
However, some people believe that innate talent is what differentiates a person who has been trained to play a sport or an instrument, from those who become good players. In other words,(解释说明论证) there is more to the skill than a learned technique, and this extra talent cannot be taught, no matter how good the teacher or how frequently a child practices.
Innate 先天的，与生俱来的
differentiate...from... 把...和...区别开来
In other words 换句话说
There is more to...than... 不仅仅是
learned 有学问的，习得的
第四段：
第四段作者提出自己的观点，即音乐、艺术和体育等的杰出成就往往与天赋有关。
I personally think that some people do have talents that are probably inherited via their genes. Such talents can give individuals a facility for certain skills that allow them to excel, while more hard-working students never manage to reach a comparable level. But, as with all questions of nature versus nurture, they are not mutually exclusive. Good musicians or artists and exceptional sports stars have probably succeeded because of both good training and natural talent. Without the natural talent, continuous training would be neither attractive nor productive, and without the training, the child would not learn how to exploit and develop their talent.
do 在文中表示强调
facility 设施，设备，灵巧
comparable 可比较的，可比得上的
mutually exclusive 互相排斥的
exceptional 异常的，例外的
在这里，考生需要注意的是往往我们在讨论并提出自己的观点时有过于绝对化，完全倾向于某一方的情况出现。这样写作就会导致极端现象，有时写作思路或是论据业没有那么清晰，不充分，从而影响整体写作分数。
而从本篇文章的整体结构就可以看出，虽然作者有一定的倾向性，但是还分析了两种观点之间的关系，先天和后天因素并不互斥。当我们在考虑问题时也可以这样去思考，想出比较折中的办法。
结尾段：
结尾段通过让步和反驳论证，总结观点。
In conclusion, I agree that any child can be taught particular skills, but to be really good in areas such as music, art or sport, then some natural talent is required.
参考译文：
天赋和训练哪个更重要，是人们在试图解释体育、艺术、音乐等方面的不同能力水平的时候经常讨论的话题。
显然，教育体系是建立在这样的信念的基础上的：所有的孩子都可以通过教育有效地获得不同的技能，包括那些和与体育、艺术或音乐相关的技能。所以，从我们的学校经历中可以发现大量的证据来支持这一观点：孩子可以通过持续的教育和有指导的练习获得这些技能。
然而，一些人认为正是先天的才干把通过训练掌握一项运动或是一件乐器的人和那些高手区别开来了。换句话说，技能不仅仅是后天习得的技巧，而这种特殊的才干没法教会，无论老师多优秀，或者孩子有多么勤于练习。
就我个人而言，我认为一些人的确有着可能通过遗传得来的才干。这种才干能让他们拥有一些技能，凭借这些技能他们能够超越他人，而那些更加勤奋的学生永远没法达到相当的程度。不过，如同所有涉及先天与后天的问题，两者不是相互排斥的，杰出的音乐家或艺术家和非凡的体育明星之所以成功，可能是因为良好的训练和天赋的共同作用。没有天赋，不断的训练可能既乏味，又没有效果;而没有训练，孩子则没法学会如何运用和发展天分。
总之，我同意任何孩子都能够学会特殊技能，但要想在音乐、艺术或体育等领域真正有所成就，是需要一些天赋的。
以上就是小编为大家介绍的详细内容，希望广大考生如愿考出自己理想的雅思成绩，更多雅思备考经验我们将会陆续为大家更新，前程百利雅思考试频道不可错过!欢迎咨询我们的热线电话400-890-6000。
您还可能关注：
