3月5日新SAT考试写作文章是出自Washington Post 华盛顿邮报的一篇文章。此次新SAT首考的作文题的阅读文章源自E.J. Dionne Jr.于2013年7月3日发表在The Washington Post(《华盛顿邮报》)文章名为 A Call for National Service。因此下面小编为大家分享的就是3月5日新SAT首考写作真题参考范文三的内容，希望大家能够学习参考。
写作考试原文>>>3月5日北美SAT考试写作文章原文
范文3：
Rights and obligations are commonly regarded as intertwined and complementary to each other, yet what invariably happens is that the former are emphasized over the latter. E. J. Dionne Jr. has created a determined argument that raised the latter to a higher level in his “A Call for National Service”. He has delivered his “call” by developing valid claims backed up with national founding documents, concrete evidence and has been able to persuade the reader by tactical reasoning and other rhetorical strategies.
Dionne Jr. initiates his argument by quoting from Declaration of Independence. The sentence entailing “unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness” is always remembered by American people and reverberated through time for centuries. In so doing, the author familiarizes the author with a common ground which is built upon the fundamental national spirits drafted by the founding fathers. Simultaneously, it serves as a pretext for the commonly overlooked clause that sheds light on the duty that “we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our Sacred Honor”. By placing these two sentences together, the author forms a vivid contrast between rights and obligations with which the Declaration endowed the Americans at the same time. More importantly, the author straightforwardly reveals people’s oblivion to obligations by pointing out that “This, the very last sentence of the document, is what makes the better-remembered sentence possible. One speaks of our rights. The other addresses our obligations.” This remark holds a strong sway over the readers, provoking their awareness of selfishness, ego-centricity and the want of obligations they owe to each other and to the country. Thus, the readers are compelled to reflect on these two direct quotations which bring it home to them that in order to enjoy and secure the freedoms they cherish, it is necessary to serve others and make contributions as well because the freedoms “are self-evident but not self-executing”. It could be said that the author’s attempts to incur and reinforce the sense of responsibility have been firmly supported by the method of direct quotation and setting contrasts.
Apart from quotation, resorting to example and authority is employed to delineate his argument. Not only does the author address the contemporary issue, but he also puts forward the proposal. To persuade the readers, he presents the example of the Franklin Project from the Aspen Institute. By discussing the project that “declares commitment to offering every American between the ages of 18 and 28 a chance to give a year of service to the country”, the author assures the reader of the authenticity and reliability of his proposal. Furthermore, he lists the exact and specific opportunities that “include service in our armed forces but also time spent educating our fellow citizens, bringing them health care and preventive services, working with the least advantaged among us, and conserving our environment”. Laying out a series of services that people can do, the author adds tremendous feasibility to his argument that young people are expected to serve the country. In addition, the trio of highly respectable figures further lends credence to the author’s argument. With the support of “retired U.S. Army Gen. Stanley McChrystal, in league with two of the country’s foremost advocates of the cause, John Bridgeland, who served in the George W. Bush administration, and Alan Khazei, co-founder of City Year, one of the nation’s most formidable volunteer groups”, the author manages to demonstrate to the reader the authoritative backup of his persuasion, thus encouraging the reader to join him in the call for national service.
The aforementioned example and appeals to authority are crucial links in the author’s whole reasoning. Based on objectivity and complexity, the writer also points out the challenges and uncertainties of his own proposal. The most striking one is concerned with the question whether volunteering should be paid or not. Authority is still applied to convey the drawback that if it were free, “then you limit the people who can do it….” Rather than exaggerating the positive effects of the proposal, the author honestly makes it clear that volunteerism should be paid. “Creating the estimated 1 million service slots required to make the prospect of service truly universal will take money, from government and private philanthropy.” Again, authority is quoted to justify his claim: “Service, as McChrystal says, cannot just be a nice thing that well-off kids do when they get out of college.” Also, Dionne Jr. openly criticizes the poisonous assumption regarding political intentions in volunteering. By straightening out the logic underlying why voluntary work should be paid, the author skillfully diminishes the excuse of interest in volunteerism for those who are less advantaged, rendering his argument logically grounded so that it drives the readers to introspect their own responsibilities to each other.
It is through diverse rhetorical devices that Dionne Jr. sells his argument. Powerful quotations, presenting example, appeals to logic reasoning and emotions all contribute to his exceptional call for national service. It is his utilization of these methods that makes this article worthy of recognition.
以上就是小编为大家介绍的2016年3月5日新SAT首考写作真题参考范文三的全部内容，希望对备考新SAT写作的考生有帮助，最后希望大家都能认真备考，最终取得理想的成绩。
您还可能关注：
