新旧SAT语法考试中会有一部分考生重复考察，虽然语法题型上发生了很大的变化，但是其中改错题和改进句子题的考点依然保留下来，会在改革后的段落中展现出来，下面我们来看下新SAT语法中逻辑关系的考察。
一.SAT语法中逻辑关系的介绍
新SAT语法中相比老SAT语法老说更加注重逻辑关系的考察了，判断上下文的逻辑关系原则是整个SAT语法高分技巧中最为基本的一个，也是解决这类问题的一个方法。
英语本身就是一种逻辑语言，这从英语中众多的连接词，过渡短语等就可以看到，而且在SAT语法考试本身就把逻辑关系纳入到了考试测试的目的中，新SAT语法中通常考察的集中逻辑关系包括因果关系，解释关系，转折关系，并列关系。新SAT语法题全部镶嵌在段逻辑中进行考察，所以考察形式主要围绕在句和句之间的关系，段落和段落的关系，所以大家一定要根据上下文好好判断。
二.新SAT语法样题解析
下面我们来通过官方的样题体会一下这
Transportation planners work closely with a number of community stakeholders, such as government officials and other interested organizations and individuals. [Q7] Next, representatives from the local public health department might provide input in designing a network of trails and sidewalks to encourage people to walk more. [Q8] According to the American Heart Association, walking provides numerous benefits related to health and well-being.
Question 7.
A. NO CHANGE (Next,)
B. For instance,
C. Furthermore,
D. Similarly,
答案：B
解析：本题考察的是句子之间的逻辑关系，上句表达交通部门需要和各种部门合作，接下来举例local public health department提供支持，因此上下句之间是举例支持的关系，所以选择B。
Question 8.
The writer is considering deleting the underlined sentence. Should the sentence be kept or deleted?
A. Kept, because it provides supporting evidence about the benefits of walking.
B. Kept, because it provides an additional example of a community stakeholder with whom transportation planners work.
C. Deleted, because it blurs the paragraph’s focus on the community stakeholders with whom transportation planners work.
D. Deleted, because it doesn’t provide specific examples of what the numerous benefits of walking are.
答案：C
解析：考查句子和文章整体的逻辑关系，该句和文章主旨没有任何关系，因此应该删除。在这道题中不仅要判断是否删除，还要给出该句被删除的原因。
以上给大家分享的就是关于新SAT语法中逻辑关系的考察，希望考生们能够对这个考点有所领悟，预祝大家取得好成绩。
您还可能关注：
