SAT阅读中双篇文章毫无疑问是sat阅读的一个难点和重点，也是其异于任何其他考试的出题方式之一。但其实双篇文章只不过换了一种阅读理解的模样或提问的方式，因此下面小编为大家介绍的就是SAT双篇阅读求同题例题详解的内容，希望对大家有帮助。
一.解题思路
求同题，顾名思义求同题主要考察的是两篇文章主旨或某细节的共同点。
我们可以仔细研究下求同题的本质，假设这道题是问文章1和文章2中心的共同点的，如果文章1的主旨要素有ab, 文章2的主旨要素有bd，那正确答案就是b的同义改写。你会发现两篇文章的主旨要素必然是有交集的，因为如果没有交集就表示没有共同点，这道题就不应该存在了。
在阅读的过程种已经大体掌握两篇文章的主要内容，因此至少能够判断哪篇文章主旨更简洁单一些，回到上面的例子，只要我们直接回去找文章2的主旨，拿它做同意改写即可，因为文章2的主旨要素要比文章1的单一，因此无论文章1在讲什么，它都必然包含有b这个要素。
更多内容查看点击：SAT阅读主旨题之解题技巧和例题详解
二.例题讲解
例题1：
2014年5月SAT真题阅读解析(Section2，Questions12)
Passage 1
…accomplish something in the play—to seduce, to humiliate,
to convince, to intimidate, to flee. By avoiding objectives
and aiming straight at the result, you get a forced product
10 that can lead to nothing but ham acting.
Passage 2
……breathing fire, you know what I mean? Well, I looked
ridiculous trying to play a tough guy. Not that I couldn’t
play a tough guy—but I was under the impression that in
20 order to be the tough guy, you had to create that tough guy
out of external appearances.
12. Both authors would most likely agree that the “tough guy” performance described in Passage 2 is
(A) frightening
(B) vulgar
(C) inauthentic
(D) insensitive to the audience
(E) motivated by inner feeling
答案：C
考点：求同题
解析：两篇文章的作者都最有可能认为文章2中描述的“tough guy”的表演是怎么样的?
(A) 吓人的
(B) 粗俗的
(C) 不真实的
(D) 不能打动观众的
(E) 有内心情感激发的
文章1中的8-10行“By avoiding objectives and aiming straight at the result, you get a forced product that can lead to nothing but ham acting.”这句话的意思是说“演员们越过了表演的真正目标，而直接追求结果，这样就只会导致虚假的表演”
文章2中的18-21行中“Not that I couldn’t play a tough guy—but I was under the impression that in order to be the tough guy, you had to create that tough guy out of external appearances.”这里表明他并不是不能演一个硬汉，只是他为了演一个硬汉而通过外部的性形象去刻意的表演这个人物。所以两篇文章说的表演都是“不真实的，刻意的”
更多内容查看点击：技巧+例题帮你巧解SAT阅读词汇题
例题2：
2014年5月SAT真题阅读解析(SECTION8, Questions 7)
Passage 1
…. “research” or “investigation, enquiry,” and he often
emphasizes that what he gives us is provisional
5 information, the best that he has been able in his researches
to discover. He sometimes interrupts the ongoing account
in his first-person voice as the narrator, precisely to remind
us not to treat the ongoing narrative as definitively true. In
discussing the thorny issue of whether the Argives went
10 over to the Persian side in the Persian Wars, he adds: “I am
obliged to record the things I am told, but I am certainly not
required to believe them—this remark may be taken to
apply to the whole of my account."
Passage 2
……own city; moreover. Herodotus more than once claims two
or more widely removed and thus apparently independent
85 sources for obviously fictive “information"; both the
systematic tidiness and the harmonious meshing of
(invented) information show us that the informants
themselves have been invented by the author. According to
this view, Herodotus is not at all a historian, or someone
90 with any respect for data, but on the contrary a gifted
narrator who has virtually made up the whole of what he
recounts.
7. Both passages mention Herodotus' strength as
(A) a storyteller
(B) an interviewer
(C) a negotiator
(D) a theorist
(E) an explorer
答案：A
考点：求同题
解析：两篇文章都提到了Herodotus的优势是?
(A) 一个故事讲述者
(B) 一个采访者
(C) 一个调节者
(D) 一个理论家
(E) 一个探险者
文章5-8行中的“the best that he has been able in his researches to discover. He sometimes interrupts the ongoing account in his first-person voice as the narrator, precisely to remind
us not to treat the ongoing narrative as definitively true.”可以充分看出希罗多德是一个很好的讲故事的人。
文章2中的88-91行“According to this view, Herodotus is not at all a historian, or someone with any respect for data, but on the contrary a gifted narrator who has virtually made up the whole of what he recounts.”这句话的意思是说，根据希罗多德自己的观点，他不仅仅是一个历史学家，更是一个能够在自己叙述的基础上进行创作的有天赋的叙述者，这也就是说他讲故事的能力很强。
更多内容查看点击：SAT阅读修辞题方法和例题详解
以上就是小编为大家介绍的SAT双篇阅读求同题例题详解的全部内容，希望大家通过上面的方法技巧和例题讲解能够对这类题型有更好的认识，最后希望大家都攻克SAT阅读的这一类题型。
您还可能关注：
