GMAT写作是GMAT考试中的一个重要组成部分，考生在备考阶段一定不要忽视GMAT写作的重要作用。接下来小编将结合具体的题目分析为大家带来GMAT分析性写作常见错误之整体推个体，希望对大家的写作备考有帮助。
什么是GMAT写作常见错误之整体推个体
整体推个体即限制了结论的范围，按照二者得一的观点得出结论，认为不是A就是B，排除了其他的可能性，按照非此即彼的观点得出结论。如， 2015年中国的人均年收入整体上呈上升趋势，因此，2015年河北省的人均年收入是呈上升趋势的。整体成上升趋势并不代表中间没有出现过下滑，并且整体呈上升趋势并不代表每个省份都是上升的。这种上升即无下滑的观点就是明显的以整体推个体。
整体推个体用英文表述为：
二者择一 (Either-Or choice)The author assumes that AA and BB are mutually exclusive alternatives and there is no room for a middle ground. However, the author provides no reason for imposing an either-or choice. Common sense tells us that adjusting both AA and BB might produce better results.
如何识别整体推个体类错误
整体推个体类的错误有不同于其他逻辑错误的特点，考生在备考阶段只要对这些特点有所了解就能准确判断题干中是否存在此类错误，为自己的写作节省时间。
1. 整体推个体的形式往往是隐形的，在论辩中经常被使用，主张对方是错误的，而将其后的逻辑推理部分(我方和对方的观点不同，所以我是正确的)隐去。
2. 单向思维，和“极端思维”类似，单向认为在一个问题上只存在两个观点，只要一个错误，另一个就正确，即“和错误的不同就是正确的”。
3. 整体推个体类错误通常是逆否命题。考生会认为很长的文章，如果其中大部分逻辑都没问题，整个逻辑都没有问题，这显然是错误的。更多相关内容请点击》如何组织GMAT分析性写作。
整体推个体类错误真题解析
The following appeared as part of a memorandum from the loan department of the Frostbite National Bank:
"We should not approve the business loan application of the local group that wants to open a franchise outlet for the Kool Kone chain of ice cream parlors. Frostbite is known for its cold winters, and cold weather can mean slow ice cream sales. For example, even though Frostbite is a town of 10,000 people, it has only one ice cream spot— the Frigid Cow. Despite the lack of competition, the Frigid Cow's net revenues fell by 10 percent last winter."
Discuss how well reasoned ... etc.
翻译： Frostbite国家银行的借贷部门的备忘录：
我们不应该批准那个希望开一家KK冰激凌连锁店的特许店的本地团体的借贷请求。Frostbite以其寒冷的冬天而闻名，而冷天气意味着冰激凌的销售不利。比如，虽然Frostbite是个有10000人的镇子，它却只有一家冰激凌店Frigid Cow。尽管缺乏竞争，Frigid Cow的净收入去年冬天下降了10%。
逻辑错误分析：1. 整体推个体，即使新的店收入情况也未必理想，不给贷款也可能有一些负面影响。比如我们银行能够通过给这家店的贷款而进入这个地区开展业务，从而拓展我们的业务范围。
1. Other factors in deciding whether to give loan to a company such as the credit of the company should be considered.
2. Admittedly, the former and prospective performance of the company is also important when the bank have to make decision of whether or not should it give loan to a company. However, the author of the memorandum show no sufficient evidence to support his or her proposal that the bank should not give loan to Kool Kone chain of ice cream parlors.
3. The statistics last year does not necessarily denote the future trend.
参考范文：
In this memorandum the loan department of Frostbite National Bank recommends against approval of a business loan to a local group that wants to open an ice cream parlor. In support of this decision the loan department points out that Frostbite has a reputation for cold winters and sales of ice cream decrease in cold weather. This latter point is buttressed by the fact that Frostbite’s only ice cream parlor suffered a 10 percent decline in net revenues the previous winter. The loan department’s decision is questionable for the following reasons.
To begin with, since it is reasonable to expect a decline in ice cream sales during winter months, it is difficult to assess the relevance of the fact that Frostbite has cold winters to the potential success of the Kool Kone franchise. Common sense suggests that this fact would be significant only if it turned out that Frostbite’s winter season lasted 9 or 10 months as it does in arctic regions. In that case slow sales could be expected for most of the year and the loan department’s opposition to the loan would be readily understandable. If, on the other hand, Frostbite’s winter season lasts only a few months and the remainder of the year is warm or hot, it is difficult to comprehend the loan department’s reasoning.
Next, the loan department assumes that the Frigid Cow’s decline in net revenue last winter was a result of slow sales occasioned by cold weather. While this is a possible reason for the decline, it is not the only factor that could account for it. For example, other factors such as poor business practices or lack of inventory could be responsible for the Frigid Cow’s loss of revenue. The loan department’s failure to investigate or even consider these and other possible explanations for the Frigid Cow’s decline in revenue renders their decision highly suspect.
In conclusion, the loan department’s decision is ill-founded. To better evaluate the decision, we would need to know more about the length and severity of Frostbite’s winter season. Moreover, evidence would have to be provided to support the assumption that the Frigid Cow’s loss of revenue last winter was a direct result of the cold weather.
以上就是GMAT分析性写作常见错误之整体推个体的主要内容，希望考生能够对文章中介绍的解题方法有所了解并不断提升自己的解题能力。更多关于GMAT备考的资讯小编会持续为大家送上，祝大家早日梦圆名校。
您还可能关注：
