GMAT写作是GMAT考试中的一个重要组成部分，考生在备考阶段一定不要忽视GMAT写作的重要作用。接下来小编将结合具体的题目分析为大家带来GMAT写作时地全等逻辑错误真题解析，希望对大家的写作备考有帮助。
GMAT写作时地全等逻辑错误
时地全等是GMAT写作中非常普遍的一种逻辑错误，考生在进行作文备考和实战时都会遇到，因此要谨慎对待。时地全等主要是指没有用发展的观点看待问题，拿过去的事例和现在的作对比，并由此得出结论。如：古代中国奉行土葬，并且规模越大越能彰显自己权高位重，现在却恰恰相反，国家严禁土葬，鼓励火葬，减少耕地占用。因此，不能用旧时的观点作为衡量现代事物的标准，要与时俱进。
时地全等的英文表述：all things are equal<纵向>
The author commits the fallacy of “all things are equal”. The fact that happened two years ago is not a sound evidence to draw a conclusion that.... The author assumes without justification that the background conditions have remained the same at different times or at different locations. However, it is not clear in this argument whether the current conditions at AA are the same as they used to be two years ago. Thus it is impossible to conclude that....
时地全等逻辑错误的特点
1. 最明显的特点就是没有用发展的观点看问题，习惯用过去的标准套用到现在的事情上，然后得出结论。
2. 前提中论述的事物与得出的结论存在明显的时间差。考生可以从时间标志词上入手。
3. 出现的概率是非常高的，考生在读题干时要格外注意时间类的词汇，把前提和结论出现的时间范围进行比较，这样更容易判断该推论的合理性。更多相关内容请点击》GMAT写作零基础该如何备考。
时地全等逻辑错误真题解析
The following appeared as part of the business plan of the Capital Idea investment firm:
"Across town in the Park Hill district, the Thespian Theater, Pizzazz Pizza, and the Niblick GolfClub have all had business increases over the past two years. Capital Idea should therefore invest in the Roxy Playhouse, the Slice-o'-Pizza, and the Divot Golf Club, three new businesses in the Irongate district. As a condition, we should require them to participate in a special program: Any customer who patronizes two of the businesses will receive a substantial discount at the third. By motivating customers to patronize all three, we will thus contribute to the profitability of each and maximize our return."
Discuss how well reasoned ... etc.
翻译： Capital Idea投资公司的商业计划：在ParkHill区的Thespian剧院，Pizzazz比萨，Niblick高尔夫俱乐部在过去2年都有业务增长。因此Capital Idea应该投资Poxy剧场，Slic-o比萨和Divot高尔夫俱乐部这3家新的Irongate区的企业。为使他们达到条件，我们应该要求他们参加特殊的项目：任何顾客在其中两家消费将在第三家得到折扣。通过刺激顾客在所有3家店消费，我们将增进每一家的利润，从而使我们的回报最大化。
分析：1.时地全等，这三家企业的利润在未来未必会继续增长。因为他们的利润在时间轴上是一个变量，因此在未来可能因为外界条件的变化而使他们的利润出现下滑。比如随着我国开始受到经济危机的影响，这些服务型的企业可能会出现亏损。2.无因果联系，即使这几家店的利润将会继续保持高水平，这也未必说明地理位置是他们利润很高的原因。因为这两者仅仅是时间相关，可能有其他的原因导致他们利润的增长。比如可能他们的老板都非常优秀，所以在他的管理之下，企业也得到了非常快速的发展。3.错误类比，即使地理位置是之前三家企业盈利的原因，这也未必说明这三家企业能获得类似的盈利。因为不同的企业之间有诸多不同，这些不同可能使得顾客对新来的三家企业没有兴趣。比如它们入驻这个地区的时间不同，使得消费者已经熟悉了前三家企业，而只去那里消费，这可能使得后来的一些企业无法盈利。4.样本不足，即使投资这三家店能够获得盈利，这一建议也未必是合理的。因为首先，这一措施可能需要很多的启动资金，而这未必是可以接受的;而其次，这一建议也未必是最佳的，可能有其他更好的企业值得我们去投资。
1， The author commits a fallcy of false analogy.
2， Therefore the proposal of investment in the Irongate district is groundless. No investment should be made until other factors have been considered and the benefit-cost analysis has been made.
3， The programme suggested by the author is reckless or even ridiculous. The possible result can be the opposite of the author's imagination because the consumers have interest of only one or two of the three stores.
1， The business increases occured in the past two years. No one can guarantee the future profit.
2， The three new companies are not necessarily analogous to those profitable ones.
3， The condition that is required is absurd. There is no causal relatioship between the condition and the collective profit.
参考范文：
the argument states that if by motivating customers to patronize all three Businesses of Capital Investment, the profitability of each business will increase and maximize return for Capital investment.To achieve this the firm proposes to initiate a program where if a customer patronizes two of the Businesses , he will receive substantial discount on the third. However there are several assumptions that the argument is based on for which it does not give sufficient evidence.
Firstly, The argument assumes that people will not otherwise go to all the three places if they go to the two places. There is no evidence to support this assumption. For example, certain demographic groups may enjoy watching theatre, playing golf and may like to eat out as well frequently. They may not select two out of the three. So by giving them heavy discount on something that they would have anyways chosen may actually negatively impact the profits.
Secondly, the argument gives the example of the success of the three businesses in the Park Hall district. However it does not clearly state the reasons behind the success of the businesses there. It appears that Capital Idea selected these businesses to invest specifically for the unique combination which they found to be successful in Park Hill district. If this is the case then the three businesses are complementary to one another and hence they will succeed as a group. So there seems no reason to explicitly ask customer to patronize the three at the cost of a discount.
In conclusion the argument is flawed for the above mentioned reasons. It can be strengthened if more evidence is given to substantiate why the proposed program would work. Without these the argument remains unconvincing and open to debate.
以上就是GMAT写作时地全等逻辑错误真题解析的全部内容，希望考生能不断改进自己的学习方法，提升效率获得理想的成绩，更多相关内容百利天下小编会持续为大家送上，祝大家都能早日梦圆名校。
您还可能关注：
