GMAT作文满分，是每一位考生梦寐以求的，那如何备考才能使自己的作文获得满分呢。接下来小编要为大家介绍GMAT写作满分范文深度剖析，希望对大家有所帮助。
GMAT写作备考要重视范文
GMAT写作备考，要高度重视范文。建议把范文分成单元，每天规定自己看五至十篇，读到一定程度的时候，自然就会熟悉其中的套路，最后做到“读书破万卷，下笔如有神”。在对范文非常熟悉之后，就可以总结出一些经验，最好能形成自己的模板。
学会举一反三
如果考生备考时间不够，那么可以不用背提纲，但必须做到以下几点：
1. 见到题目，能立即反应出大概从哪三点切入，这就是所谓的思路，没有思路才是写作的大忌。
2. 准备好例子素材。一般来说，一篇作文至少要包含三个分论点，那么想出论点后就要立刻想出配套的例子，一定要在考前充实一些例子。例子一写，字数一下就上去了。
3. 一定要举一返三。GMAT作文很多题目看似不同，但本质上其实说的都是一个问题，把内容类似的题目放在一起复习，复习一个就等于复习好几个，这种举一反三的做法可以大大提升复习效率。如：
The following appeared as part of a company memorandum: "Adopting an official code of ethics regarding business practices may in the long run do our company more harm than good in the public eye. When one of our competitors received unfavorable publicity for violating its own code of ethics, it got more attention from the media than it would have if it had had no such code. Rather than adopt an official code of ethics, therefore, we should instead conduct a publicity campaign that stresses the importance of protecting the environment and assisting charitable organizations."
Discuss how well reasoned ... etc.
公司备忘录的一部分：采用正式的商业操作道德条例从长远看对我公司在公众眼中的形象弊大于利。当我们的一个竞争者由于违反了他自己的道德条例从而得到公众指责时，他会从媒体那里得到比没有条例时更多的关注。因此，与其采用正式的道德条例，我们不如开展一场强调保护环境和帮助慈善组织的公众运动。
逻辑分析：1.无因果联系， 竞争者获得媒体的关注未必是因为他们不遵守道德准则。因为这两者可能仅仅是时间相关，而有其他的原因导致了竞争者获得了媒体的关注。比如他们活动的内容非常精彩，或者是活动的主题很有意义，或者是活动请来的嘉宾很有名。2.错误类比， 即使竞争对手获得关注确实是因为他们不遵守道德，我们公司照搬他们的做法也未必能取得类似的效果。因为两家公司可能有诸多不同，而这些差异可能会使类似的策略无效。比如我们公司主营健康向上主题的活动，那么不遵守道德的一些策略可能未必能起到很好的活动效果。3.时地全等，即使不遵守道德是可行的，这个建议也有负面影响，以及未必最佳的问题。第一，不遵守道德可能会给公司带来一定的负面影响，比如公众形象的破坏等;第二，不遵守道德未必是提升活动效果的最佳方案，其他方案诸如改进活动质量、改变目标人群等，可能能够达到更好的效果。更多相关内容请点击》提高GMAT写作能力的六大技巧。
满分范文剖析
首段：This argument states that it makes financial sense for employers to make the workplace safer because by making the workplace safer then lower wages could be paid to employees. This conclusion is based on the premise that as the list of physical injury increases, the wages paid to employees should also increase. However, there are several assumptions that may not necessarily apply to this argument. For example, the costs associated with making the workplace safe must outweigh the increased payroll expenses due to hazardous conditions. Also, one must look at the plausability of improving the work environment. And finally, because most companies agree that as the risk of injury increases so will wages doesn’t necessarily mean that the all companies which have hazardous work environments agree.
中间段1：The first issue to be addressed is whether increased labor costs justify large capital expenditures to improve the work environment. Clearly one could argue that if making the workplace safe would cost an exorbitant amount of money in comparison to leaving the workplace as is and paying slightly increased wages than it would not make sense to improve the work environment. For example, if making the workplace safe would cost $100 million versus additional payroll expenses of only $5,000 per year, it would make financial sense to simply pay the increased wages. No business or business owner with any sense would pay all that extra money just to save a couple dollars and improve employee health and relations. To consider this, a cost benefit analysis must be made. I also feel that although a cost benefit analysis should be the determining factor with regard to these decisions making financial sense, it may not be the determining factor with regard to making social, moral and ethical sense.
中间段2:This argument also relies on the idea that companies solely use financial sense in analysing improving the work environment. This is not the case. Companies look at other considerations such as the negative social ramifications of high on-job injuries. For example, Toyota spends large amounts of money improving its environment because while its goal is to be profitable, it also prides itself on high employee morale and an almost perfectly safe work environment. However, Toyota finds that it can do both, as by improving employee health and employee relations they are guaranteed a more motivated staff, and hence a more efficient staff; this guarantees more money for the business as well as more safety for the employees.
中间段3:Finally one must understand that not all work environments can be made safer. For example, in the case of coal mining, a company only has limited ways of making the work environment safe. While companies may be able to ensure some safety precautions, they may not be able to provide all the safety measures necessary. In other words, a mining company has limited ability to control the air quality within a coal mine and therefore it cannot control the risk of employees getting blacklung. In other words, regardless of the intent of the company, some jobs are simply dangerous in nature.
末段:In conclusion, while at first it may seem to make financial sense to improve the safety of the work environment sometimes it truly does not make financial sense. Furthermore, financial sense may not be the only issue a company faces. Other types of analyses must be made such as the social ramifications of an unsafe work environment and the overall ability of a company to improve that environment (i.e., coal mine). Before any decision is made, all this things must be considered, not simply the reduction of payroll expenses.
1、GMAT作文字数高达599words, 充分而全面的对题干中的逻辑错误进行了反驳和论证，使文章非常具有说服力，但建议考生尽量把字数控制在450个左右，切忌字数堆砌。
2、GMAT考试时采取标准的五段制，首段、末端，中间三段，看上去很清晰。
3、没有陈词滥调、语言表达准确有效。
这篇GMAT作文采用的是考生熟知的段落结构，整篇文章看上去非常合理，令人耳目一新。希望大家在写作备考过程中也能多多参考高分满分范文，从中学习总结出一些规律和方法，提升自己的写作实力。
以上是关于GMAT写作满分范文深度剖析的详细内容，希望大家也能从中受益，不断改进自己的备考方法提升备考效率，从而写出漂亮的文章获得满意的成绩。更多相关内容百利天下小编会持续为大家送上，祝大家都能早日梦圆名校。
您还可能关注：
