在GMAT写作中，想要写出高分作文，考生首先要了解正确的写作顺序。下面小编就来为大家带来GMAT写作流程举例讲解。
读题审题写开头段
首先，考生要浏览题目、审题(分析题目的结论、论据和假设)并写出开头段。审题和开头段同时进行，一边看题一边写，这不是回避逻辑错误，而是将审题、找错和写作有机地结合。第一段的任务无非就是指出论题的结论、假设、论据，并指出题目有错误。在写作第一段的时候，逻辑错误会不断的涌现出来，而当考生把有问题的假设以及原论证的逻辑结构清理以后，该论证所存在的所有问题也就都暴露出来了。例如:
The following appeared in the editorial section of a daily newspaper: "Although forecasts of presidential elections based on opinion polls measure current voter preference, many voters keep changing their minds about whom they prefer until the last few days before the balloting. Some do not even make a final decision until they enter the voting booth. Forecasts based on opinion polls are therefore little better at predicting election outcomes than a random guess would be." Discuss how well reasoned ... etc.
日报的社论：虽然基于民调的总统选举预测可以估计当前选民的倾向。但很多选民直到选举前几天一直拿不定主意。一些人甚至在进投票站之前都没法最后决定。因此基于民调的预测和随机猜测相比在预期选举结果方面好不了多少。
确定开头段：In this editorial the author asserts that opinion polls are little better than random guesses to predicting outcomes of presidential elections. The author's basis for this assertion is that opinion polls measure only the preferences of voters at the time of the poll and that many voters change their preferences several time before voting—some remaining undecided until the moment they cast their vote. The author's reasoning is unconvincing in two critical respects.
列逻辑问题写提纲
在写完开头段并审好题后，要趁着头脑清醒，把主要的逻辑问题都打出来。原文可能出现六七个逻辑错误，而考生只需要从中挑出3-4个最主要的进行有利的攻击就可以了。因为这篇文章能不能拿高分，直接取决于与你能否抓住主要逻辑错误。也就是说，如果忽视了非常致命的逻辑错误，那么即使把其它的错误批驳得再好，所用的语言再美，字数再多，最后照样不及格。与其把一个问题分析的特别透彻，不如把所有的主要问题都涉及到，即使不很透彻，也比前者要好。
逻辑分析：1. 结论无据，作者忽略了调查中的随机误差所占的比例，就盲目地认为调查不可靠，因而其结论有误。因为可能随机误差很小，不会影响调查的结果，这样的话调查结论就是可靠的。比如误差只有1%，而两位候选人的民意调查支持率相差了10%，那么很显然调查的结果就可以作为预测的依据。2. 无因果联系，即使民调的误差确实超过了有效的统计信息，这也不能说明民调是无用的。因为民调可以为候选人提供关于其支持率的重要信息，而候选人可以根据此信息及时改变选举策略。比如误差很大代表了选民的摇摆，那么候选人就应该努力支持这些摇摆选民的支持，这就需要他们提出更为包容而不是偏激的竞选方案。更多相关内容请点击》提高GMAT写作能力的六大技巧。
展开正文
在完成了提纲之后，就要逐一展开正文段落了。正文段落的展开有两种的顺序，第一种就是先攻击主要的问题，在第一个段落批驳最重要的逻辑错误，也花最多的笔墨，以后字数和重要性逐级递减。另外一种就是以论证的逻辑关系为序一层一层的批驳。不论何种方式，都应遵循展开文章的一个整体原则，也就是挑最有话可说的先说。实际上，顺序是可以在检查时通过剪切和复制调整的。
一般情况下都是一段攻击一个主要的逻辑问题。如果逻辑错误很多，那么可以在最后一个正文段集中批判一下，而最后一段中的每个错误点到为止即可。对于除此以外的逻辑错误，都应该至少提供一个能批驳原论证的反例或假设。而对于正文段落(除去开头段和结尾段)的数量，没有正确或错误之分，但由于每篇官方范文都含有2个以上的正文段，所以文章的正文段数量最好应达到2至4段，全篇最好为4至6段，每个正文段针对一个主要的问题， 每段以4-8句话为宜。句子太少会导致论证不充分，而如果一段超过8句必然有重复的内容，论证效果就会有缺陷，因此每段的句子数量并非越多越好。
First of all the predictions based on random guessing are such that the greater the number of candidates, the less likely the prediction will be correct. The reason for this is obvious: random guessing requires that no outside information be allowed to influence the guess. Predictions based on opinion polls, on the other hand, will differ considerably from those based on random guesses simply because outside information will influence the result. For example, in a four-person race, random guessing would yield the correct prediction 25 percent of the time, whereas the percentage of correct predictions based on opinion polls would be much higher. The reason for this disparity is simple. Opinion polls enable us to narrow the choices. That is, opinion polls serve to reduce the number of viable candidates in the voter's mind and thereby increase the likelihood that the prediction based on them will be correct.
In addition, while it is true that many voters change their minds several times before voting, and that some remain undecided until entering the voting booth, this is not true of everyone. Moreover, people who do change their minds frequently or wait until the last moment to decide have typically narrowed their choice to a few candidates
结尾点题并检查全文
结尾段的功能只有两个，即再次指出原论证有错误，并指出如何能弥补该错误。
In conclusion, the author is mistaken in believing that random guessing would be as reliable as opinion polls in predicting the outcomes of presidential elections.
最后，大家要留下哪怕是两分钟的时间来检查。首先要检查拼写，还要看看语法，有没有代词指代不清，主谓不一致，单复数问题，时态错误，或者第三人称单数没加s等情况，两分钟扫描是最理想的。另外，要注意行文时文章是否有足够的转承连接词，以显示文章的连贯性。
以上是关于GMAT写作流程真题讲解的详细内容，希望大家也能从中受益，不断改进自己的备考方法提升备考效率，从而写出漂亮的文章获得满意的成绩。更多相关内容百利天下小编会持续为大家送上，祝大家都能早日梦圆名校。
您还可能关注：
