下面，小编为大家分享的是GRE写作Argument简介视频讲解的内容，考生可以从中了解Argument的内容，写作方式以及技巧。
简介：
Argument即为驳论文，题干中给了一段话，这段话中包含一些推论或论据方面的漏洞，需要考生找出这些逻辑错误，并进行攻击。
ETS公布了Argument的题库，考试时由计算机从题库中随机抽出一道题进行考试，考试时间为30分钟。
中文范文：
三年前，经有关部门调查，A老师说话语速过快，这严重影响了学生的学习，所以，A老师不是一个合格的老师。
结论：A老师不是一个合格的老师
论据漏洞：1)三年前，时间上的漏洞;2)经有关部门调查存在的漏洞有：调查的主体，调查的对象，调查的方式、调查的数量、调查的规模;3)A老师说话语速过快存在的漏洞是因果关系不成立
满分标准：
1. 准确地找到题干中的逻辑错误，并深入地进行分析
2. 观点令人信服，组织结构符合逻辑，过渡连接清晰
3. 用清晰而充分的推理来支持论点
4. 文章语言和句子使用流利和准确
5. 文章中包含很少的语法错误
Tips：
1. 结构完整，清晰表达个人观点;
2. 找全重要的逻辑错误;
3. 避免任何语法问题，拼写问题;
4. 合理编排逻辑错误顺序;
八种题目要求：
1. Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.
根据题目要求写文章。在论证中，你应该讨论一下我们需要什么具体的论据来评判这个论证，并解释这些论证是怎样削弱或加强上述论证的。
2. Write a response in which you examine the stated and/or unstated assumptions of the argument. Be sure to explain how the argument depends on these assumptions, and what the implications are for the argument if the assumptions prove unwarranted.
根据题目要求写文章。在论证中，你应该审查出那些论述出或未论述出的论证的条件。一定要解释下，这个论证是怎样依赖于这些条件的，以及如果这些是无根据的，那么这个论证的隐含条件是什么。
3. Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered in order to decide whether the recommendation and the argument on which it is based are reasonable. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help to evaluate the recommendation.
根据题目要求写文章。在论证中，你应该讨论一下，为了决定这个推荐以及建立在此推荐上的论证是否合理，我们应该回答出什么问题。一定要解释一下，针对这些问题的答案是怎么帮助我们评判这个推荐的。
4. Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered in order to decide whether the advice and the argument on which it is based are reasonable. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help to evaluate the advice.
根据题目要求写文章。在论证中，你应该讨论一下，为了决定这个建议以及建立在此建议上的论证是否合理，我们应该回答出什么问题。一定要解释一下，针对这些问题的答案是怎么帮助我们评判这个建议的。
5. Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered in order to decide whether the recommendation is likely to have the predicted result. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help to evaluate the recommendation.
根据题目要求写文章。在论证中，你应该讨论一下，为了决定这个推荐是否会收到预期后果，我们应该回答什么问题。一定要解释一下，针对这些问题的答案是怎么帮助我们评判这个推荐的。
6. Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered in order to decide whether the prediction and the argument on which it is based are reasonable. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help to evaluate the prediction.
根据题目要求写文章。在论证中，你应该讨论一下，为了决定这个预测以及建立在此预测上面的论证是否合理，我们应该回答出什么问题。一定要解释一下，针对这些问题的答案是怎么帮助我们评判这个预测的。
7. Write a response in which you discuss one or more alternative explanations that could rival the proposed explanation and explain how your explanation(s) can plausibly account for the facts presented in the argument.
根据题目要求写文章。在论证中，你应该讨论出一个或者多个的其他解释能够去反驳文章里面提出的解释。并且解释一下，你的解释是怎样很好的解释论证中所提到的事实。
8. Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be addressed in order to decide whether the conclusion and the argument on which it is based are reasonable. Be sure to explain how the answers to the questions would help to evaluate the conclusion.
根据题目要求写文章。在论证中，你应该讨论一下，为了决定这个结论和基于结论则论证是否合理，我们应该回答出什么问题。一定要解释一下，针对这些问题的答案是怎样帮助我们评判这个预测的。
开头策略
1. 抄写型开头
2. 分析型开头
抄写型开头策略：
(3-4个句子表达三个层面的意思)
1. 复述原论述的结论或者主张
2. 归纳原论述的假设、证据
3. 指出原论述犯了逻辑错误
抄写型范文展示：
In this Argument, the arguer concludes that daily use of Ichthaid will help people to prevent colds and lower absenteeism. To support this conclusion, the arguer cites the evidence that in East Meria, people seldom to the hospital for the treatment of colds because of the high consumption of this supporting evidence, however, reveals that it lends little credible support to the arguer’s suggestion.
抄写型开头段写作注意事项：
1. 在归纳原题信息时尽可能用自己的词汇和句式，但核心词可以保留
2. 复述原题信息要准确客观
3. 分析性动词(对于原论者的指责批驳)一般现在时，这是全文的基本时态;但在复述原题基本信息时保留原题的时态。
二、分析型开头
在开头段展现作者的整个完整推理过程。
分析型范文展示：
Grounding on the study in East Meria, supposing that eating a substantial amount of fish can prevent colds, and then synthesizing the hypothesizes and another factor that colds are the reason most frequently given for absences from school and work, the author accordingly suggests that the daily use of Ichthaid is a good way to prevent colds and lower absenteesim. However……
正文策略
1. 每段攻击一个主要的逻辑错误
2. 若该题的逻辑错误多于3个时，则可以用两段先分别攻击两个主要的逻辑错误，其他次要逻辑错误全部放在正文第三段
3. 每段第一句话为topic Sentence
逻辑错误编排顺序：
1. 题干出现顺序;
2. 轻重顺序;
3. 逻辑顺序;
常用句型：
1. The arguer rests on the gratuitous/unreasonable assumption that…
2. The arguer fails to establish a causal relationship between…and…
3. The major problem with this arguer is that…
4. The arguer’s conclusion depends on the questionable assumption that…
5. The author ignores/fails to take into account other likely reasons why……
6. Another weakness worth pointing out is that…
7. The reasoning that … is open to doubt(problematic, questionable, unconvincing, unfounded, unwarranted)
8. Another assumption in short of legitimacy is the causal relationship claimed between … and …
9. The arguer commits a fallacy of…
10. The fact that… does not ensure that…/lends no strong support to…
11. The evidence provided in this argument is not sufficient to validate the assumption that …
12. The statistical evidence/the result of the survey upon which the argument relies is too vague to be informative.
结尾策略：
The ending of the composition is unimportant. You only need to recite some models to finish the ending.
以上就是小编为大家整理的GRE写作Argument简介视频讲解的全部内容，希望对大家有帮助。
您还可能关注：
