本节视频百利天下名师为考生详细的分析新GRE argument提纲之题库83.84.85.86，即冲刺argument4.5分题目两栖动物、阅读习惯、下岗员工。希望考生更够好好的利用，创作属于自己的模板。
冲刺argument4.5分题目两栖动物。
Argument83.
The following is a letter to the editor of an environmental magazine.
"In 1975 a wildlife census found that there were seven species of amphibians in Xanadu National Park, with abundant numbers of each species. However, in 2002 only four species of amphibians were observed in the park, and the numbers of each species were drastically reduced. There has been a substantial decline in the numbers of amphibians worldwide, and global pollution of water and air is clearly implicated. The decline of amphibians in Xanadu National Park, however, almost certainly has a different cause: in 1975, trout—which are known to eat amphibian eggs—were introduced into the park."
思路解析：
1.为了评估arguer的论证过程，这里需要的一个证据就是这两次调查是否是真实可靠的。
2.为了评估arguer的论证过程，这里需要的一个证据除了鲑鱼以外就没有别的因素导致两栖动物的数量下降。
3.为了评估arguer的论证过程，这里需要的一个证据是否空气污染导致了两栖动物数量的较少。
Argument83题同Argument84的提纲相同，所以解析可以参照上文的提纲解析。
冲刺argument4.5分题目阅读习惯。
Argument85.
In a study of the reading habits of Waymarsh citizens conducted by the University of Waymarsh, most respondents said that they preferred literary classics as reading material. However, a second study conducted by the same researchers found that the type of book most frequently checked out of each of the public libraries in Waymarsh was the mystery novel. Therefore, it can be concluded that the respondents in the first study had misrepresented their reading habits.
思路解析：
1.为了评估arguer的论证过程，这里需要的一个证据就是后续调查是否一定都是真实可靠的。
2.为了评估arguer的论证过程，这里需要的一个证据就是后续调查是真实可靠地，到那时从图书馆借的书大多数是悬疑小说，也不能说明人们不是更青睐文学经典名著，可能...
3.为了评估arguer的论证过程，这里需要的一个证据就是两个调查是否隔了很长时间，如果间隔了很久，就有可能..
冲刺argument4.5分题目下岗员工。
Argument86.
The following appeared in a memo at XYZ company. "When XYZ lays off employees, it pays Delany Personnel Firm to offer those employees assistance in creating résumés and developing interviewing skills, if they so desire. Laid-off employees have benefited greatly from Delany's services: last year those who used Delany found jobs much more quickly than did those who did not. Recently, it has been proposed that we use the less expensive Walsh Personnel Firm in place of Delany. This would be a mistake because eight years ago, when XYZ was using Walsh, only half of the workers we laid off at that time found jobs within a year. Moreover, Delany is clearly superior, as evidenced by its bigger staff and larger number of branch offices. After all, last year Delany's clients took an average of six months to find jobs, whereas Walsh's clients took nine."
思路解析：
1.为了评估arguer的论证过程，我们需要更具体的证据就是说明去年接受D的帮助的下岗员工比没有的员工更快找到工作就能表明D比W好。
2.为了评估arguer的论证过程，我们需要更具体的证据就是W八年前的情况能和现在是一样的。
3.为了评估arguer的论证过程，我们需要更具体的证据就是员工、分公司更多就是能说明W更好。
4.为了评估arguer的论证过程，我们需要更具体的证据就是去年w和E的客户找到工作的平均时间比较能说明W更好。
冲刺argument4.5分题目
题干相似，题库要求求有所区别的题目汇总：
Argument82题同Argument56的提纲相同，所以解析可以参照》强化argument4分题目专利生产、生产效率、家庭设施
以上即是关于冲刺argument4.5分题目两栖动物、阅读习惯、下岗员工的视频讲解，希望老师的讲解可以更好地帮助考生!
您还可能关注：
