在GMAT写作中，一些看似不起眼的细节往往会决定一篇GMAT作文的得分。下面小编就为大家介绍GMAT写作细节要点真题解析，希望对大家的写作备考有帮助。
跳过题目要求
GMAT作文的题目要求都是一样的，属于公式性质的文字，考生不要浪费时间再去读一遍。建议把这部分的阅读时间留在读题干上。
找到逻辑漏洞
所谓逻辑漏洞，就是指logical fallacy,考生的任务就是把题干中的逻辑漏洞全部找出来，并进行一一论证。逻辑漏洞和大家的作文成绩紧密相连。如果考生不能把里面的逻辑漏洞全部找出来，就不能得到很好地成绩，这是必然的。因为逻辑漏洞的点会直接影响你的作文成绩。如：The following appeared as part of a plan proposed by an executive of the Easy Credit Company to the president:
"The Easy Credit Company would gain an advantage over competing credit card services if we were to donate a portion of the proceeds from the use of our cards to a well-known environmental organization in exchange for the use of its symbol or logo on our card. Since a recent poll shows that a large percentage of the public is concerned about environmental issues, this policy would attract new customers, increase use among existing customers, and enable us to charge interest rates that are higher than the lowest ones available." Discuss how well reasoned ... etc.
逻辑漏洞分析：1.可疑调查，作者引用的调查结论不一定有普适性，因为样本选择不一定够大或者够全。如果这是一个针对特定地区特定人群的调查，那么调查结论就无法适用于信用卡的使用者，因而对信用卡公司就毫无帮助。2.结论无据，即使调查无误地揭示了公众对于环保的热情，这也无法保证环保标志能帮助信用卡公司吸引更多的客户。因为客户在选择信用卡时，还有其他的考虑因素。比如信用卡的额度、还款方式或者是积分奖励情况。因此这一举措不一定能吸引到更多的客户。3.没有用发展的观点看问题，即使这一举措确实能吸引更多的客户，这一建议也可能有负面的影响。比如捐出去的这笔钱或许会给公司带来很大的财政负担，并且使得公司投资的风险被提高;而即使没有负面影响，公司也可以通过其他的方式吸引更多的客户，比如提高信用卡的支付额度，降低客户的准入门槛等。
结构合理性
结构合理性是考生在读题干时首先要注意的细节，可以说是重中之重，因此怎么强调都不过分。考生要思考题干中的结论和前提是否符合逻辑结构，如果不符合，问题出在哪里，要怎样进行攻击和论证。
正文展开顺序介绍
GMAT作文正文段落的展开有两种的顺序，第一种就是先攻击主要的问题，在第一个段落批驳最重要的逻辑错误，也花最多的笔墨，以后字数和重要性逐级递减。另外一种就是以论证的逻辑关系为序一层一层的批驳。不论何种方式，都应遵循展开文章的一个整体原则，也就是挑最有话可说的先说。实际上，顺序是可以在检查时通过剪切和复制调整的。更多相关内容请点击》GMAT写作词汇如何灵活运用。
范文参考
In this argument the author concludes that the Easy Credit Company would gain several advantages over its competitors by donating a portion of its profits to a well- known environmental organization in exchange for the use of the organization's logo on their credit card. The author reaches this conclusion on the basis of a recent poll that shows widespread public concern about environmental issues. Among the advantages of this policy, the author foresees an increase in credit card use by existing customers, the ability to charge higher interest rates, and the ability to attract new customers. While the author's argument has some merit, it suffers from two critical problems.
To begin with, the author assumes that the environmental organization whose logo is sought is concerned with the same environmental issues about which the poll shows widespread concern. However, the author provides no evidence that this is the case. It is possible that very few credit-card users are concerned about the issues that are the organization's areas of concern; if so, then it is unlikely that the organization's logo would attract much business for the Easy Credit Company.
Next, the author assumes that the public's concern about environmental issues will result in its taking steps to do something about the problem—in this case, to use the Easy Credit Company credit card. This assumption is unsupported and runs contrary to experience. Also, it is more reasonable to assume that people who are concerned about a particular cause will choose a more direct means of expressing their concern.
In conclusion, the author's argument is unconvincing as it stands. To strengthen the argument, the author must show a positive link between the environmental issues about which the public has expressed concern and the issues with which this particular environmental organization is concerned. In addition, the author must provide evidence to support the assumption that concern about a problem will cause people to do something about the problem.
以上是关于GMAT写作细节要点真题解析的具体讲解，希望大家也能从中受益，加强练习，不断提升自己的备考效率获得满意的成绩。更多相关内容百利天下小编会持续为大家送上，祝大家都能早日梦圆名校。
您还可能关注：
