这三大类型分别是argument construction、argument evaluation和formulating and evaluating a plan of action，我们可以称之为评价行动方案题、论点评价题和评价行动方案题三种。下面是详细内容。
一、GMAT逻辑评价行动方案题的定义
实践计划题要求考生去识别不同实践方案的有效性或效率，加强或削弱实践计划方案成功的因素、及假设等。这类题型出现的频率不高，考生遇到这种题型可以结合以上两种题型的特点和解题方法进行有效作答。
(详情请看 GMAT逻辑三种类型分析之评价行动方案题 )
二、GMAT逻辑评价行动方案题的考察内容
这方面的问题主要要求识别：
1、不同行动方案的相对合适性、有效性或效率(the relative appropriateness，effectiveness，or efficiency of different plans of action)
2、加强或削弱拟议行动方案成功可能性的因素(factors that would strengthen，or weaken，the prospects of success for a proposed plan of action)
3、拟议行动计划所基于的假设(assumptions underlying a proposed plan of action)
(详情请看 GMAT逻辑三种类型分析之论点评价题 )
三、GMAT逻辑评价行动方案题的例题分析
为了帮助大家理解评价行动方案题，小编整理了一道例题，通过分析例题来体会这类题型的考察方式和答题方法。
According to a prediction of the not-so-distant future published in 1940, electricity would revolutionize agriculture. Electrodes would be inserted into the soil, and the current between them would kill bugs and weeds and make crop plants stronger.(结论：电极插入泥土，杀死虫子杂草， 助长农作物)
Which of the following, if true, most strongly indicates that the logic of the prediction above is flawed?
(A) In order for farmers to avoid electric shock (与结论不相干)while working in the fields, the current could be turned off at such times without diminishing the intended effects.
(B) If the proposed plan for using electricity were put into practice, farmers would save on chemicals (不相干)now being added to the soil.
(C) It cannot be taken for granted that the use of electricity is always beneficial.(题目没让 证明 always beneficial)
(D) Since weeds are plants, electricity would affect weeds in the same way as it would affect crop plants.(削弱：找出了结论中明显逻辑错误)
(E) Because a planting machine (题目没说)would need to avoid coming into contact with the electrodes, new parts for planting machines would need to be designed.
1、正确答案：
D Correct. This statement properly identifies a problem with the prediction: It provides no reason to believe that the electricity would affect crop plants and weeds differently.
2、例题分析：
Situation In 1940, electricity was predicted to revolutionize agriculture. This prediction suggested that electric current running between electrodes inserted into the soil would kill bugs and weeds while encouraging the growth of crop plants.
Reasoning Which point most suggests that the logic used in formulating the prediction is flawed? Electricity will revolutionize agriculture, it is said, because current can be run through electrodes placed in the soil. This current will kill bugs and weeds while strengthening plants. But how will the current accomplish this feat? More specifically, how will it kill one kind of plant (weeds) while strengthening another (crop plants)?
3、选项分析：
A The logic of the prediction has nothing to do with whether the current can be turned on and off; rather, it is concerned with the current itself and its effects.
B Rather than suggesting that the logic of the prediction is flawed, this serves to support the prediction: Farmers’ saving on chemicals would be part of the predicted agricultural revolution.
C The argument does not take for granted that the use of electricity is always beneficial; it merely suggests that it would be of great benefit to agriculture.
E Rather than suggesting that the logic of the prediction is flawed, this serves to support the prediction: Changes in planting machines would be part of the predicted agricultural revolution.
(详情请看 GMAT逻辑例题分析 )
至此，GMAT逻辑当中的三大类型小编就介绍完了，如果大家想要整理了解三种题型的概念可以点击文章中的链接，小编将三类题目的文章综合在一起供大家查看。
您还可能关注
